|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/11-taDOM2+-21-CHtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getFragment(contextNode) returns NodelistThe getFragmentNodes operation returns a node list with all descendant nodes of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- readCS
- readFC
- readCH
- readLC
- readDC
- readCA
- readAS
- readAX
- readXS
- useCOFCE
- useCOLCE
- useFCPSE
- useFCNSE
- useFCFCE
- useFCLCE
- useCHPSE
- useCHNSE
- useCHFCE
- useCHLCE
- useLCPSE
- useLCNSE
- useLCFCE
- useLCLCE
- useDCPSE
- useDCNSE
- useDCFCE
- useDCLCE
Read Set = CO CS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS COFCE COLCE FCPSE FCNSE FCFCE FCLCE CHPSE CHNSE CHFCE CHLCE LCPSE LCNSE LCFCE LCLCE DCPSE DCNSE DCFCE DCLCE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node CHThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute does not already exist and must be created. The operation returns the new value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = CH , Write Set = DC - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock SR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock SR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|