|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/11-taDOM2+-5-LCtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getFragment(contextNode) returns NodelistThe getFragmentNodes operation returns a node list with all descendant nodes of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- readCS
- readFC
- readCH
- readLC
- readDC
- readCA
- readAS
- readAX
- readXS
- useCOFCE
- useCOLCE
- useFCPSE
- useFCNSE
- useFCFCE
- useFCLCE
- useCHPSE
- useCHNSE
- useCHFCE
- useCHLCE
- useLCPSE
- useLCNSE
- useLCFCE
- useLCLCE
- useDCPSE
- useDCNSE
- useDCFCE
- useDCLCE
Read Set = CO CS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS COFCE COLCE FCPSE FCNSE FCFCE FCLCE CHPSE CHNSE CHFCE CHLCE LCPSE LCNSE LCFCE LCLCE DCPSE DCNSE DCFCE DCLCE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) executed on node LCThe getNextSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the last child of parent node PA and no next sibling node NS exists.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = LC COLCE LCNSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] on LC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock SR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock SR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] on LC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|