|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/17-taDOM2+-20-PS
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) returns NodeThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = , Write Set = CO - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node PSThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on PS:Read Set = PS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|