|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/17-taDOM2+-6-AC
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) returns NodeThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = , Write Set = CO - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation getFirstChild(contextElementNode) executed on node ACThe getFirstChild operation returns the first child FC of the context node CO.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCOFCE
- readFC
- useFCPSE
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC PA , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|