|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/20-taDOM2+-34-COtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) returns NodeThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO CA , Write Set = AS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node COThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the only child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyPALCE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE PALCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock NR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock IX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on CO | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|