|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/21-taDOM2+-23-CH
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) returns NodeThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute does not already exist and must be created. The operation returns the new value node AS.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO , Write Set = CA AS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node CHThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = CH , Write Set = CHLCE DCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|