|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/21-taDOM2+-26-LC
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) returns NodeThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute does not already exist and must be created. The operation returns the new value node AS.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO , Write Set = CA AS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node LCThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child. The context element node CO has still no child nodes before this operation. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the now only child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyCOLCE
Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = LC , Write Set = LCFCE LCLCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|