|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/23-taDOM2+-17-LC
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COLCE LCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node LCThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = , Write Set = LC - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|