|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/23-taDOM2+-19-CA
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COLCE LCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextAttrNode, valueString) executed on node CAThe setValue operation executed on the context attribute node CA returns the modified attribute string node AS which contains the actual node value.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CA:Read Set = CA , Write Set = AS - LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|