|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/23-taDOM2+-30-LC
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COLCE LCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) executed on node LCThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There does not exist a next sibling, so the context element node was the last child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new last child of PA) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyPALCE
Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = LC , Write Set = COLCE LCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on LC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on LC | On CO the last child edge lock EX is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on LC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | On LC The next sibling edge lock EX is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on LC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|