|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/24-taDOM2+-20-ACtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child. The context element node CO has still no child nodes before this operation. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child.The new appended child node (the now only child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyCOLCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COFCE COLCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node ACThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|