|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/25-taDOM2+-17-CHtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the new first child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyFCPSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COFCE FCPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node CHThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = , Write Set = CH - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|