|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/25-taDOM2+-32-ACtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the new first child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyFCPSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COFCE FCPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node ACThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = , Write Set = AC PA PS CO CS NS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|