|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/3-taDOM2+-28-COtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getPrevSibling(contextNode) returns null valueThe getPrevSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the first child of parent node PA and no previous sibling node PS exists.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO PAFCE COPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation insertBefore(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) executed on node COThe insertBefore operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new previous sibling node before the context node CO. There does not exist a previous sibling, so the context element node was the first child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new first child of PA) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOPSE
- modifyPAFCE
Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = CO , Write Set = PAFCE COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | On CO the previous sibling edge lock ER is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock NR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock NR on CN compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | On PA the first child edge lock ER is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Test Case Ok |
|