|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/3-taDOM2+-31-AC
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getPrevSibling(contextNode) returns null valueThe getPrevSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the first child of parent node PA and no previous sibling node PS exists.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO PAFCE COPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node ACThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = , Write Set = AC PA PS CO CS NS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|