|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/30-taDOM2+-24-FCtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There does not exist a next sibling, so the context element node was the last child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new last child of PA) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyPALCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = PALCE CONSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node FCThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child. The context element node CO has still no child nodes before this operation. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child.The new appended child node (the now only child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyCOLCE
Read and write sets for execution on FC:Read Set = FC , Write Set = FCFCE FCLCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|