UniKL Logo

Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme

FB Informatik
FB Informatik
 
LG IS
AG DBIS
AG HIS
Jobs / Tasks
Courses
Publications
Contact
Misc
Impressum
(C) AG DBIS
  

Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-17-CH

taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothing

The deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.

Behavior specified with base operations:

  • modifyPSNSE
  • modifyNSPSE
  • writeCO
  • writeFC
  • writeCH
  • writeLC
  • writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]

taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node CH

The setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.

Bahavior specified with base operations:

  • writeCO

Read and write sets for execution on CH:

Read Set = , Write Set = CH
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
  • LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
  • LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH

Operations must be incompatible

CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
Incompatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
Incompatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Requested lock CX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
Incompatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH		Compatible
Test Case Ok