|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-19-AXtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextAttrNode, valueString) executed on node AXThe setValue operation executed on the context attribute node CA returns the modified attribute string node AS which contains the actual node value.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on AX:Read Set = AX , Write Set = XS - LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AX | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|