|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-2-LCtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation getPrevSibling(contextNode) executed on node LCThe getPrevSibling operation returns the previous sibling node PS of the context node CO.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCOPSE
- readPS
- usePSNSE
Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = CH LC CHNSE LCPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|