|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-21-LCtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node LCThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute does not already exist and must be created. The operation returns the new value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on LC:Read Set = LC , Write Set = DC - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|