Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme

FB Informatik

LG IS

AG DBIS

(C) AG DBIS

Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-22-LC

taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothing

The deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.

Behavior specified with base operations:

modifyPSNSE
modifyNSPSE
writeCO
writeFC
writeCH
writeLC
writeDC

Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE

LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]

taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) executed on node LC

The renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.

Bahavior specified with base operations:

readCO
writeCA

Read and write sets for execution on LC:

Read Set = LC , Write Set = DC

LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC

Operations must be incompatible

Check	Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC	Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.	Incompatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC	Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.	Incompatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC	Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.	Incompatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC	Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.	Incompatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC	Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.	Incompatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Check	Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Test Case Ok