|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-25-FC
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node FCThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the new first child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyFCPSE
Read and write sets for execution on FC:Read Set = FC , Write Set = FCFCE DCPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|