|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/31-taDOM2+-4-PAtaDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) executed on node PAThe getNextSibling operation returns the next sibling node NS of the context node CO.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCONSE
- readNS
- useNSPSE
Read and write sets for execution on PA:Read Set = PA , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock NR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|