|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/8-taDOM2+-32-PS
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getLastChild(contextElementNode) returns NodeThe getLastChild operation returns the last child LC of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCOLCE
- readLC
- useLCNSE
Read Set = CO LC COLCE LCNSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node PSThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on PS:Read Set = , Write Set = PS PAFCE COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|