|
|
Test Case taDOM2+/9-taDOM2+-22-NS
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of executed Operation getLastChild(contextElementNode) returns null valueThe getLastChild operation returns null because the context node CO does not have any child nodes.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO COFCE COLCE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2+ Lock Requests of checked Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) executed on node NSThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on NS:Read Set = NS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|