UniKL Logo

Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme

FB Informatik

FB Informatik
 
LG IS
AG DBIS
AG HIS
Jobs / Tasks
Courses
Publications
Contact
Misc
Impressum
(C) AG DBIS
 

Correctness of the Conversion Matrix for taDOM2+

 Held
Lock
 Requested
Lock
 Resulting
Lock
 Description
The held lockIRfor the request ofIRis replaced withIRThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockIRfor the request ofNRis replaced withNRThis is correct.The resulting NR is stronger than the existing IR and requested NR.
The held lockIRfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRThis is correct.The resulting LR is stronger than the existing IR and requested LR.
The held lockIRfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The resulting SR is stronger than the existing IR and requested SR.
The held lockIRfor the request ofIXis replaced withIXThis is correct.The resulting IX is stronger than the existing IR and requested IX.
The held lockIRfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing IR and requested LRIX.
The held lockIRfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing IR and requested SRIX.
The held lockIRfor the request ofCXis replaced withCXThis is correct.The resulting CX is stronger than the existing IR and requested CX.
The held lockIRfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing IR and requested LRCX.
The held lockIRfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing IR and requested SRCX.
The held lockIRfor the request ofSUis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing IR and requested SU.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request) but SR is still stronger than the existing IR.
The held lockIRfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing IR and requested SX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofIRis replaced withNRThis is correct.The resulting NR is stronger than the existing NR and requested IR.
The held lockNRfor the request ofNRis replaced withNRThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockNRfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRThis is correct.The resulting LR is stronger than the existing NR and requested LR.
The held lockNRfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The resulting SR is stronger than the existing NR and requested SR.
The held lockNRfor the request ofIXis replaced withIXThis is correct.The resulting IX is stronger than the existing NR and requested IX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing NR and requested LRIX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing NR and requested SRIX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofCXis replaced withCXThis is correct.The resulting CX is stronger than the existing NR and requested CX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing NR and requested LRCX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing NR and requested SRCX.
The held lockNRfor the request ofSUis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing NR and requested SU.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request) but SR is still stronger than the existing NR.
The held lockNRfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing NR and requested SX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofIRis replaced withLRThis is correct.The resulting LR is stronger than the existing LR and requested IR.
The held lockLRfor the request ofNRis replaced withLRThis is correct.The resulting LR is stronger than the existing LR and requested NR.
The held lockLRfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockLRfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The resulting SR is stronger than the existing LR and requested SR.
The held lockLRfor the request ofIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing LR and requested IX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing LR and requested LRIX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing LR and requested SRIX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LR and requested CX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LR and requested LRCX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing LR and requested SRCX.
The held lockLRfor the request ofSUis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing LR and requested SU.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request) but SR is still stronger than the existing LR.
The held lockLRfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing LR and requested SX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofIRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The resulting SR is stronger than the existing SR and requested IR.
The held lockSRfor the request ofNRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The resulting SR is stronger than the existing SR and requested NR.
The held lockSRfor the request ofLRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The resulting SR is stronger than the existing SR and requested LR.
The held lockSRfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockSRfor the request ofIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SR and requested IX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SR and requested LRIX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SR and requested SRIX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SR and requested CX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SR and requested LRCX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SR and requested SRCX.
The held lockSRfor the request ofSUis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing SR and requested SU.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request) but SR is still stronger than the existing SR.
The held lockSRfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SR and requested SX.
The held lockIXfor the request ofIRis replaced withIXThis is correct.The resulting IX is stronger than the existing IX and requested IR.
The held lockIXfor the request ofNRis replaced withIXThis is correct.The resulting IX is stronger than the existing IX and requested NR.
The held lockIXfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing IX and requested LR.
The held lockIXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing IX and requested SR.
The held lockIXfor the request ofIXis replaced withIXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockIXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing IX and requested LRIX.
The held lockIXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing IX and requested SRIX.
The held lockIXfor the request ofCXis replaced withCXThis is correct.The resulting CX is stronger than the existing IX and requested CX.
The held lockIXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing IX and requested LRCX.
The held lockIXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing IX and requested SRCX.
The held lockIXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing IX and requested SU.
The held lockIXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing IX and requested SX.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofIRis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested IR.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofNRis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested NR.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested LR.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested SR.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The resulting LRIX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested IX.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRIXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested SRIX.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested CX.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested LRCX.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested SRCX.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested SU.
The held lockLRIXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing LRIX and requested SX.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofIRis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested IR.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofNRis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested NR.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofLRis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested LR.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested SR.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested IX.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The resulting SRIX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested LRIX.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRIXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested CX.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested LRCX.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested SRCX.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested SU.
The held lockSRIXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SRIX and requested SX.
The held lockCXfor the request ofIRis replaced withCXThis is correct.The resulting CX is stronger than the existing CX and requested IR.
The held lockCXfor the request ofNRis replaced withCXThis is correct.The resulting CX is stronger than the existing CX and requested NR.
The held lockCXfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing CX and requested LR.
The held lockCXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing CX and requested SR.
The held lockCXfor the request ofIXis replaced withCXThis is correct.The resulting CX is stronger than the existing CX and requested IX.
The held lockCXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing CX and requested LRIX.
The held lockCXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing CX and requested SRIX.
The held lockCXfor the request ofCXis replaced withCXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockCXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing CX and requested LRCX.
The held lockCXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing CX and requested SRCX.
The held lockCXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing CX and requested SU.
The held lockCXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing CX and requested SX.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofIRis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested IR.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofNRis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested NR.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofLRis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested LR.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested SR.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofIXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested IX.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested LRIX.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested SRIX.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The resulting LRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested CX.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withLRCXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested SRCX.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested SU.
The held lockLRCXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing LRCX and requested SX.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofIRis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested IR.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofNRis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested NR.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofLRis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested LR.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested SR.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofIXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested IX.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested LRIX.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested SRIX.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested CX.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The resulting SRCX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested LRCX.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSRCXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested SU.
The held lockSRCXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SRCX and requested SX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofIRis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing SU and requested IR.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request), SR is not stronger than the existing SU but this is an intended downgrade.
The held lockSUfor the request ofNRis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing SU and requested NR.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request), SR is not stronger than the existing SU but this is an intended downgrade.
The held lockSUfor the request ofLRis replaced withSUThis is correct.The resulting SU is stronger than the existing SU and requested LR.
The resulting lock SU can be graded down to SR (in case of a further SR request), SR is not stronger than the existing SU but this is an intended downgrade.
The held lockSUfor the request ofSRis replaced withSRThis is correct.Although the resulting lock SR is not stronger than the held lock SU, this lock conversion is correct because this situation is a intended downgrade from SU to SR.
The held lockSUfor the request ofIXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested IX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested LRIX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested SRIX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofCXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested CX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested LRCX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested SRCX.
The held lockSUfor the request ofSUis replaced withSUThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.
The held lockSUfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SU and requested SX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofIRis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested IR.
The held lockSXfor the request ofNRis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested NR.
The held lockSXfor the request ofLRis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested LR.
The held lockSXfor the request ofSRis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested SR.
The held lockSXfor the request ofIXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested IX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofLRIXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested LRIX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofSRIXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested SRIX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofCXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested CX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofLRCXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested LRCX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofSRCXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested SRCX.
The held lockSXfor the request ofSUis replaced withSXThis is correct.The resulting SX is stronger than the existing SX and requested SU.
The held lockSXfor the request ofSXis replaced withSXThis is correct.The already held lock is requested again.