|
|
Test Case taDOM2/11-taDOM2-17-CH
taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getFragment(contextNode) returns NodelistThe getFragmentNodes operation returns a node list with all descendant nodes of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- readCS
- readFC
- readCH
- readLC
- readDC
- readCA
- readAS
- readAX
- readXS
- useCOFCE
- useCOLCE
- useFCPSE
- useFCNSE
- useFCFCE
- useFCLCE
- useCHPSE
- useCHNSE
- useCHFCE
- useCHLCE
- useLCPSE
- useLCNSE
- useLCFCE
- useLCLCE
- useDCPSE
- useDCNSE
- useDCFCE
- useDCLCE
Read Set = CO CS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS COFCE COLCE FCPSE FCNSE FCFCE FCLCE CHPSE CHNSE CHFCE CHLCE LCPSE LCNSE LCFCE LCLCE DCPSE DCNSE DCFCE DCLCE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node CHThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CH:Read Set = , Write Set = CH - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock SR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock CX on CO incompatible to existing lock SR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CH | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|