|
|
Test Case taDOM2/17-taDOM2-11-CA
taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) returns NodeThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = , Write Set = CO - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation getFragment(contextNode) executed on node CAThe getFragmentNodes operation returns a node list with all descendant nodes of the context node CO.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- readCS
- readFC
- readCH
- readLC
- readDC
- readCA
- readAS
- readAX
- readXS
- useCOFCE
- useCOLCE
- useFCPSE
- useFCNSE
- useFCFCE
- useFCLCE
- useCHPSE
- useCHNSE
- useCHFCE
- useCHLCE
- useLCPSE
- useLCNSE
- useLCFCE
- useLCLCE
- useDCPSE
- useDCNSE
- useDCFCE
- useDCLCE
Read and write sets for execution on CA:Read Set = CA AS AX XS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|