|
|
Test Case taDOM2/22-taDOM2-33-NS
taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) returns NodeThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO , Write Set = CA - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node NSThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the last child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPALCE
- modifyPSNSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on NS:Read Set = , Write Set = NS PALCE CONSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|