|
|
Test Case taDOM2/22-taDOM2-7-ACtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) returns NodeThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO , Write Set = CA - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation getFirstChild(contextElementNode) executed on node ACThe getFirstChild operation returns null because the context node CO does not have any child nodes.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:ER] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|