|
|
Test Case taDOM2/23-taDOM2-22-NStaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COLCE LCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation renameAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrOldNameString, ctxAttrNewNameString) executed on node NSThe renameAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and renames the context attribute CA with the passed old name to the passed new name. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on AR must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getAttributes() method on the context node. The operation returns the rename attribute node CA.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on NS:Read Set = NS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AR,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|