|
|
Test Case taDOM2/23-taDOM2-29-ACtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COLCE LCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) executed on node ACThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There already exists a next sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyNSPSE
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock CX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock CX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|