|
|
Test Case taDOM2/24-taDOM2-30-NStaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child. The context element node CO has still no child nodes before this operation. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child.The new appended child node (the now only child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyCOLCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COFCE COLCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) executed on node NSThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There does not exist a next sibling, so the context element node was the last child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new last child of PA) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyPALCE
Read and write sets for execution on NS:Read Set = NS , Write Set = PALCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|