|
|
Test Case taDOM2/25-taDOM2-29-NStaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) returns NodeThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the new first child) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyFCPSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = COFCE FCPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) executed on node NSThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There already exists a next sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyNSPSE
Read and write sets for execution on NS:Read Set = NS , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|