|
|
Test Case taDOM2/28-taDOM2-23-FCtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation insertBefore(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertBefore operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new previous sibling node before the context node CO. There does not exist a previous sibling, so the context element node was the first child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new first child of PA) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOPSE
- modifyPAFCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = PAFCE COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node FCThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read and write sets for execution on FC:Read Set = FC , Write Set = FCLCE DCNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on FC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on FC | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|