|
|
Test Case taDOM2/28-taDOM2-25-ACtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation insertBefore(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertBefore operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new previous sibling node before the context node CO. There does not exist a previous sibling, so the context element node was the first child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new first child of PA) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOPSE
- modifyPAFCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = PAFCE COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation prependChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node ACThe prependChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and prepends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new prepended child node (the new first child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOFCE
- modifyFCPSE
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock CX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock CX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock CX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=FC,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|