UniKL Logo

Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme

FB Informatik

FB Informatik
 
LG IS
AG DBIS
AG HIS
Jobs / Tasks
Courses
Publications
Contact
Misc
Impressum
(C) AG DBIS
 

Test Case taDOM2/29-taDOM2-17-NS

taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns Node

The insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There already exists a next sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.

Behavior specified with base operations:

  • readCO
  • modifyCONSE
  • modifyNSPSE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = CONSE NSPSE
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]

taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node NS

The setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.

Bahavior specified with base operations:

  • writeCO

Read and write sets for execution on NS:

Read Set = , Write Set = NS
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
  • LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
  • LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS

Operations must be compatible

CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR.
Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on NS
Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
Compatible
Test Case Ok