|
|
Test Case taDOM2/30-taDOM2-17-COtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) returns NodeThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There does not exist a next sibling, so the context element node was the last child of the parent node PA and the inserted new sibling node (the new last child of PA) is returned.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyPALCE
Read Set = CO , Write Set = PALCE CONSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextElementNode, valueString) executed on node COThe setValue operation executed on the context element node CO returns the modified context element itself. In taDOM2(+) the CX lock on PA must be requested additionally in order to prevent an execution of the getChildNodes() method on the parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = , Write Set = CO - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock NR on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on CO compatible to existing lock NR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock NR on CO compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CN incompatible to existing lock NR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|