|
|
Test Case taDOM2/31-taDOM2-2-ACtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation getPrevSibling(contextNode) executed on node ACThe getPrevSibling operation returns the previous sibling node PS of the context node CO.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCOPSE
- readPS
- usePSNSE
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|