UniKL Logo

Lehrgebiet Informationssysteme

FB Informatik
FB Informatik
 
LG IS
AG DBIS
AG HIS
Jobs / Tasks
Courses
Publications
Contact
Misc
Impressum
(C) AG DBIS
  

Test Case taDOM2/31-taDOM2-21-LC

taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothing

The deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.

Behavior specified with base operations:

  • modifyPSNSE
  • modifyNSPSE
  • writeCO
  • writeFC
  • writeCH
  • writeLC
  • writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PSNSE NSPSE
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
  • LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]

taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node LC

The setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute does not already exist and must be created. The operation returns the new value node AS.

Bahavior specified with base operations:

  • readCO
  • writeCA
  • writeAS

Read and write sets for execution on LC:

Read Set = LC , Write Set = DC
  • LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
  • LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC
  • LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC

Operations must be incompatible

CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
Incompatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
Incompatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
Incompatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
CheckExisting LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on LC		Compatible
Test Case Ok