|
|
Test Case taDOM2/32-taDOM2-4-CO
taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) executed on node COThe getNextSibling operation returns the next sibling node NS of the context node CO.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCONSE
- readNS
- useNSPSE
Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = CO NS CONSE NSPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock NR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | On NS the previous sibling edge lock EX is incompatible to the requested ER
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|