|
|
Test Case taDOM2/33-taDOM2-19-CAtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the last child of its parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPALCE
- modifyPSNSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PALCE PSNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation setValue(contextAttrNode, valueString) executed on node CAThe setValue operation executed on the context attribute node CA returns the modified attribute string node AS which contains the actual node value.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CA:Read Set = CA , Write Set = AS - LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|