|
|
Test Case taDOM2/33-taDOM2-23-PAtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the last child of its parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPALCE
- modifyPSNSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PALCE PSNSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node PAThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read and write sets for execution on PA:Read Set = PA , Write Set = PALCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock CX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA | On PA the last child edge lock EX is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|