|
|
Test Case taDOM2/34-taDOM2-20-FC
taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the only child of its parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyPALCE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE PALCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation setAttribute(contextElementNode, ctxAttrNameString, valueString) executed on node FCThe setAttribute operation is executed on the context element node CO and sets a new value of the context attribute node CA. The named context attribute already exists and the operation returns the value node AS.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on FC:Read Set = FC DC , Write Set = DC - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
- LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IR on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | Requested lock IX on CO incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CA,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=AS,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on FC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|