|
|
Test Case taDOM2/34-taDOM2-29-ACtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the only child of its parent node.
Behavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyPALCE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE PALCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation insertAfter(contextNode, siblingType, siblingValue) executed on node ACThe insertAfter operation is executed on the context element node CO and inserts a new next sibling node after the context node CO. There already exists a next sibling and the inserted new sibling node is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCONSE
- modifyNSPSE
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = AC , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock NR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock CX on AC compatible to existing lock IX.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:EX] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|