|
|
|
  Test Case taDOM2/35-taDOM2-3-CA
taDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation deleteNode(contextNode) returns nothingThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context attribute node CA and deletes the complete attribute.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = , Write Set = CA AS - LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation getPrevSibling(contextNode) executed on node CAThe getPrevSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the first child of parent node PA and no previous sibling node PS exists.
Bahavior specified with base operations:Read and write sets for execution on CA:Read Set = CA , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] on CA
Operations must be incompatible| Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock NR on CA incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CA | Requested lock IR on CA incompatible to existing lock SX.
| Incompatible | | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CA,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
with
Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:ER,LCE:-] on CA | | Compatible | | Test Case Ok |
|
