|
|
Test Case taDOM2/4-taDOM2-31-PStaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns NodeThe getNextSibling operation returns the next sibling node NS of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCONSE
- readNS
- useNSPSE
Read Set = CO NS CONSE NSPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node PSThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO (an arbitrary child of PA) and deletes the context node. Previous and next sibling nodes are existing.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPSNSE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on PS:Read Set = , Write Set = PS COPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS
Operations must be compatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PS | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|