|
|
Test Case taDOM2/4-taDOM2-32-COtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns NodeThe getNextSibling operation returns the next sibling node NS of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCONSE
- readNS
- useNSPSE
Read Set = CO NS CONSE NSPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node COThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the first child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPAFCE
- modifyNSPSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on CO:Read Set = , Write Set = CO FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS PAFCE NSPSE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock NR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock SX on CO incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | On NS the previous sibling edge lock ER is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=NS,lock:-,PSE:EX,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:EX,LCE:-] on CO | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|