|
|
Test Case taDOM2/4-taDOM2-33-ACtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns NodeThe getNextSibling operation returns the next sibling node NS of the context node CO.
Behavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- useCONSE
- readNS
- useNSPSE
Read Set = CO NS CONSE NSPSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation deleteNode(contextNode) executed on node ACThe deleteNode operation is executed on the context element node CO and deletes the context node. Thereby, the context node is the last child of its parent node.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- modifyPALCE
- modifyPSNSE
- writeCO
- writeFC
- writeCH
- writeLC
- writeDC
Read and write sets for execution on AC:Read Set = , Write Set = AC PA PS CO CS NS FC CH LC DC CA AS AX XS - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on AC
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NS,lock:NR,PSE:ER,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:SX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | Requested lock SX on AC incompatible to existing lock IR.
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PS,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on AC | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=NN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on AC | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|