|
|
Test Case taDOM2/5-taDOM2-23-PAtaDOM2 Lock Requests of executed Operation getNextSibling(contextNode) returns null valueThe getNextSibling operation returns null because the context node CO is the last child of parent node PA and no next sibling node NS exists.
Behavior specified with base operations:Read Set = CO PALCE CONSE , Write Set = - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-]
- LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER]
taDOM2 Lock Requests of checked Operation appendChild(contextElementNode, childType, childValue) executed on node PAThe appendChild operation is executed on the context element node CO and appends a new child to the (at least one) already existing child nodes. The CX resp. NRCX lock on the context node is caused by the SX lock on the new child. The new appended child node (the new last child) is returned.
Bahavior specified with base operations:- readCO
- modifyCOLCE
- modifyLCNSE
Read and write sets for execution on PA:Read Set = PA , Write Set = PALCE - LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA
- LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
- LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA
Operations must be incompatibleCheck | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CO,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:ER,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA | Requested lock IX on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock CX on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | Requested lock IR on AC compatible to existing lock IR. Requested lock IR on PA compatible to existing lock IR.
| Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CO,lock:CX,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:EX] on PA | On PA the last child edge lock ER is incompatible to the requested EX
| Incompatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=CN,lock:NR,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Check | Existing LockRequest[node=PA,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:-,FCE:-,LCE:ER] with Requested LockRequest[node=LC,lock:-,PSE:-,NSE:EX,FCE:-,LCE:-] on PA | | Compatible | Test Case Ok |
|